I have objected, again, to the order on Churchill FP4, which was re-issued in its original form with the typo sending the diversion into Cuxham uncorrected. The quality of their diversion maps, when related to the planning applications, remains abysmal (this is partly due to the quality of the developers’ site plans as well).
The claim for Islip FP18 to the sports field, originally set up by [name removed at their request]’s father in the 1950s, has been confirmed.
The legislation relating to claims for rights of way that are not yet on the Definitive Map is set to change. The details were set out in last year’s Newsletter, but the change is not yet in force because the regulations have (as I write) not yet been agreed; we are expecting these to come into force soon. I have a number of candidates which need further examination, including one passing close to Campsfield Detention Centre, and one in Wardington to the county boundary near Chacombe. All paths which were in existence prior to 1949 need to be claimed, including those in council estates built before that date.
And if you were wondering how a well-known hazard came into being ...